Do Cyclists Really Need Sports Drinks?

My Interpretation

The above is my paraphrasing the BMJ report, and not my interpretation necessarily. I will note that I am likely one of the very few scientists in the field of exercise physiology and hydration research with no conflicts of interests. Apart from my doctoral research in the mid 1990s being funded by contracts with the Canadian Forces, I have had no direct or indirect interactions with any companies related to sports drinks.

I also know well many of the scientists involved on both sides of the argument as friends and colleagues for many years. Therefore, I think I'm well placed to give a hopefully objective perspective to this controversial field (feel free to comment otherwise and provide your own insight).

More: 11 Hydration Strategies for Hot Weather

Conflicts of Interests

The field of exercise physiology is actually a very small world and the funding pales in comparison to big medical or pharmaceutical fields. Therefore, it is VERY hard to find scientists who have no conflicts of interests to create an "independent" oversight group. Knowing many of these scientists in and out of the lab, I certainly do not buy into a conspiracy theory approach that there is deliberate misrepresentation going on.

I do agree with the charge about large policy making bodies, like ACSM, making position statements about hydration while being directly supported by sports drink companies. If nothing else, the optics are very, very murky this way.

Summary: a draw on this one. I believe in the scientists on both sides of the issue, but I have a harder time trusting large organizations.

More: Hydration and Electrolyte Tips for Race Day

Dehydration vs Hyponatremia

I think this issue is wracked by imprecise arguments, with me arguing one idea, you arguing a separate idea, and both of us incorrectly thinking we're arguing the same idea. Let's look at what I see:

- Would I err on the side of dehydration or hyponatremia? This is simple?both are not desired and should be avoided!

- Do indeed listen to your thirst. It is an important psychophysiological signal to guide your behavior. This is exactly analogous to using Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE) as a gauge for your workload. Is it perfectly accurate? Not nearly compared to direct measurement of power output. However, can it be trained to be more accurate and reliable? Absolutely. Listen to your thirst, use it with pre/post exercise weighing to get an idea of fluid loss, and drink a reasonable amount to avoid too much fluid loss or too much drinking.

- How much is too much loss? Keep track of how you perform and feel with different levels of drinking during exercise, and keep track of your weight over multiple days to make sure you can train yourself to drink enough to recover day-to-day.

More: 15 Hydration Facts for Athletes

Water vs Sports Drinks

Going for a relatively easy and short ride of 60 to 90 minutes? You're likely fine with water, as it's hard even with high-intensity exercise to deplete your glycogen to dangerous levels to risk bonking or inadequate day-to-day recovery. The report does raise a good point?if your goal with cycling is weight loss, why handicap the 500 kcal you burned off on the ride by stuffing yourself with 250 kcal during the ride itself?

I know my constant theme is experience and to experiment with your own responses with nearly everything related to fitness and training. But again, experience is the key. Personally, if I'm riding in the afternoon for 60 minutes or more, I'll usually have a bottle of sports drink with me, as I find that I'm usually famished about 4 p.m., even with a big lunch. For me, I just don't seem to get lunch into my system that well no matter how much or often I eat over the course of the workday.

More: Measure Your Sweat Loss for Optimal Hydration

Weak Hydration Science?

This argument fro the report I don't really buy into, but I'll admit that this might be because I'm too embedded into my field and its style of research. The field is again much smaller than big medical or pharmaceutical research, and there are no "standard" protocols for exercise testing, subject selection, statistics, etc. Therefore, it's completely expected that there be wide disparity across study designs. You just have to examine things as they are.

I also don't buy into the small sample size issue. This is absolutely part and parcel of exercise physiology research, and I find the statistics and analysis, in general, sound and appropriate for the majority of studies.

More: The Truth About Sports Drinks After Exercise


I know I absolutely sound like a broken record, but ignore the hyperbole from the extreme arguments on both sides, and the moderate path is usually a safe and good one.

There IS a role for sports drinks for cyclists. It's not a magic bullet but it's also not fool's gold either. Try out different drinks to see which ones tastes good to you and seems to work well for your gut and your performance. Then use them on the bike the way that's best for you.

Ride fast and have fun!

More: Do Sports Drinks Cause Cavities?

Active logoReady to ride? Search for a cycling event.
  • 2
  • of
  • 2

Discuss This Article